Support for vulnerable people wanting to live independently in their own homes and people facing a sudden financial crisis has collapsed in Greater Manchester with local authorities struggling to respond to demand due to the severity of central government cuts, according to a major new study by Greater Manchester Poverty Action (GMPA).
Since the government’s decision to devolve responsibility for Community Care Grants and Crisis Loans to local authorities in the form of local welfare assistance schemes in 2013, spending on this vital crisis support in Greater Manchester has fallen from £19 million in 2010/11 to £3.8 million in 2017/18.
With no ringfenced funding or requirement on local authorities to operate schemes, some increasingly cash strapped councils in Greater Manchester are having to cut funding for their schemes. The consequence is that local welfare assistance schemes are often run on a shoe string and have come nowhere near close to replicating the support that was available through Community Care Grants and Crisis Loans. In fact, GMPA’s analysis shows:
In Greater Manchester there were 123,220 Crisis Loans for household items and expenditure and Community Care Grants awards made in 2010/11 compared to 10,077 successful applications for support through local welfare assistance schemes in 2017/18. A fall of 92%.
GMPA Director Graham Whitham said, “The Government’s hands-off approach to crisis support has failed. It was unrealistic to expect local councils to pick up the responsibility for crisis support during a period when councils in Greater Manchester have been facing unprecedented cuts to their budgets and without any proper guidance or support from central government.”
Graham continued, “The consequence of the Government’s approach has been the emergence of an ad hoc approach to crisis support across Greater Manchester and the rest of England. There is no consistency of provision and the type of support people can access varies massively across the country. In many areas local schemes are underfunded and not well advertised. Having a well-funded and well-operated scheme in the place where you live could be the difference between living independently in your own home or ending up on the streets.”
Despite being under financial pressure all ten local authorities in Greater Manchester maintain local welfare assistance schemes. However, the budgets for schemes have been cut in five out of the ten boroughs over the last three financial years, and significantly so in the cases of Trafford (a 35% drop) and Bury (a 55% drop) councils. The budgets for the local welfare assistance schemes in Bolton, Stockport and Tameside fell by 21%, 7% and 15% respectively over the same period.
Salford City Council increased the budget for its scheme by 49% and Rochdale Council by 14% between 2015/16 and 2017/18. Manchester City Council and Wigan Council have kept the budgets for their schemes broadly flat. Oldham Council does not set an annual budget allocation for its local welfare assistance scheme and is instead using historic reserves from central government.
Because of the lack of central government support or guidance, schemes vary considerably from one area to another. Worryingly, two thirds of local welfare assistance schemes in England don’t provide cash grants or loans, with people instead being provided with vouchers, referrals and advice. Local authorities are increasingly reliant on being able to signpost people to third sector lead provision.
In some instances, the support being provided by schemes is incredibly narrow and therefore can’t meet different needs. GMPA found several schemes that are restricted to supporting people with energy bills but not other household costs.
