Buckley Hall Prison near Rochdale was found by inspectors to be a “very safe prison” in which violence and use of force by staff had fallen over the last three years.

The prison, during the inspection in July 2019, held a population ranging in age and sentence length. Nearly a third of prisoners were serving indeterminate sentences and 45 men were serving life.

Peter Clarke, HM Chief Inspector of Prisons, said it was an excellent inspection “and we are pleased to report that we judged outcomes for prisoners to be ‘good’ – our highest assessment – in three of our four tests of a healthy prison.” Those tests were for safety, respect and rehabilitation and release planning. “Our one concern was that more work was still needed to improve the quality and outcomes of education and work,” Mr Clarke added.

The 2019 assessments overall, however, reflected significant improvement at Buckley Hall since the last inspection, in 2016. Only seven per cent of prisoners said they felt unsafe, which was much lower than in comparable prisons. Recorded violence and use of force had reduced since 2016 and work to reduce it further was robust and multi-disciplinary. Mr Clarke said: “The rehabilitative ethos that pervaded the prison was, in our view, key to the quality of engagement seen among prisoners, which in turn was reflected in the calm and settled atmosphere.”

Self-harm had increased since 2016 but remained comparatively low, though there had been one self-inflicted death. The key worker scheme was embedded and effective with nearly all prisoners reporting they had a personal officer and 78% saying that they thought their personal officer was useful. Living conditions were generally very good.

Time out of cell for prisoners remained very good and much better than inspectors often see. The quality of education, work and skills provision had, however, deteriorated and Ofsted inspectors rated the overall effectiveness of provision as “requires improvement”. Engagement by prisoners in activity and learning was excellent, but recent improvements to provision had yet to have sufficient impact and the quality of teaching and learning, as well as achievements and progress made by learners, needed to be better.

In contrast, work to support and promote family ties was excellent and work to reduce the risk of reoffending was similarly very good, despite many prisoners presenting a high risk of harm. In the inspection survey prisoners thought their experiences at the prison had made them less likely to offend in the future.

Overall, Mr Clarke said:

“Buckley Hall is a very good prison. It had got the basics right and there was meaningful attention to detail that supported good outcomes for those detained. Prisoners could see this, and were personally incentivised to respond positively. Work undertaken throughout the prison was usually multi-disciplinary, and often based on useful evidence and an effective use of data and subject to effective governance and oversight. A culture of respect and rehabilitation, led from the top, permeated all aspects of the prison’s work and culture, and was a quality that seemed to be embraced by all departments. Good leadership and a confident and respectful staff had achieved much through hard work, underpinned by an ethos and culture they had created. They should be congratulated.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here