The government’s Progress 8 measure for evaluating secondary school performance has been criticised in a new report out this morning
The analysis Developed by the University of Bristol for the Northern Powerhouse Partnership adjusts for variables including pupil demographics, ethnicity, and deprivation, showing the real difference schools make as compared with pretending that every school has an identical intake with the same socio-economic status and background.
Amongst its findings are that high average Progress 8 score seen in London more than halves when adjustments are made for pupil demographics.
This primarily reflects the higher proportion of on average high-progress ethnic groups in its schools.
In the North East, whose schools serve a high proportion of disadvantaged and White British pupils, Progress 8 scores improve substantially after our adjustments are applied.
While the high average Progress 8 scores for grammar and faith schools reduce substantially when adjustments account for the educationally advantaged nature of their pupil intakes.
For regions in the North of England (North East, North West, and Yorkshire and the Humber), the analysis shows a wide range of category changes once pupil background is taken into account.
For example, 64 schools go from being average to above or well above average, 6 go from below average straight to above average and a further 149 schools labelled by the Department for Education under the previous government as below or well below average move to being average.
NPP is calling on the government to introduce a contextually adjusted measure alongside Progress 8 by 2025.
This approach would provide a more comprehensive outlook on school performance, highlighting the achievement of individual schools and show what differences between regions are a result of demographic differences common across England, and those issues which aren’t just about the concentration of those challenges but are actually specific to the places themselves.
Henri Murison, Chief Executive of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, said:
“The Fairer Schools Index exposes the shortcomings of Progress 8 being used to measure any schools performance on its own. By failing to account for a number of different variables related to pupils’ backgrounds, the last government labelled many schools in areas like the North East of England as under-performing while failing to account for demographic differences in helping drive higher outcomes in London schools.”
“ At the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, we want to close all the gaps between disadvantaged children and the rest, but this will never happen if we label schools as better performing by simply attracting better off families to send their children there. We are advocating for the adoption of a value-added measure side by side the current, unadjusted data. This will allow us to recognise better those school’s that do the most for those children from backgrounds too often let down in modern Britain.”
“We must demand the best for every child. Those schools that beat the odds stacked against their pupils should be recognised as being high performing, and that will drive down the disadvantage gap over the decade to come and reduce the gaps which exit across and between parts of England today.”
